1,456 | 0 | 79 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
初中毕业生家长在高中阶段的教育选择中不愿为子女选择职业教育,这严重影响我国技术技能人才的培养和制造强国目标的达成。通过对10位初中毕业生家长的访谈,并基于扎根理论分析,将就业前景、个体因素、职校因素和社会认同确定为影响初中毕业生家长职业教育选择的四大影响因素,并构建了影响机制模型。发现家长对子女未来发展的理性考量直接影响其职业教育选择观念;职校因素会通过影响就业前景间接影响家长职业教育选择观念;社会认同受就业前景影响并直接影响家长职业教育选择观念;就业前景与家长职业教育选择观念受其他各因素调节。在此基础上,提出教育选择的本质是职业选择。要让家长接受职业教育,关键在于提高技术技能人才地位,拓宽晋升发展空间;提高职业学校教学质量,增强学生就业适配性;改善社会文化环境,营造有利发展氛围。
Abstract:Parents of junior high school graduates are reluctant to choose vocational education for their children during high school, which significantly impacts the cultivation of technical and skilled talents in China and the achievement of the goal of becoming a manufacturing power. Through interviews with 10parents of junior high school graduates and analysis based on grounded theory, this study identifies four major influencing factors on parents' choices regarding vocational education: employment prospects, individual factors, vocational school factors, and social identity, and constructs an influencing mechanism model. It is found that parents' rational considerations about their children's future development directly affect their perceptions of vocational education choices. Vocational school factors indirectly influence parents' perceptions by affecting employment prospects. Social identity is influenced by employment prospects and directly affects parents' perceptions of vocational education choices. Employment prospects and parents' perceptions of vocational education choices are moderated by other factors. Based on these findings, the study proposes that the essence of educational choice is career choice. To encourage parents to accept vocational education, it is crucial to enhance the status of technical and skilled talents and broaden career advancement opportunities, improve the teaching quality of vocational schools to enhance students' employability and improve the socio-cultural environment to create a favorable development atmosphere.
[1]习近平:高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL].(2022-10-25)[2024-08-21].https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm.
[2]周慧梅,汪冰冰.家庭资本、代际传承与教育选择——以一个乡村教师世家“考中师”为考察中心[J].教师教育研究,2017,29(6):95-100.
[3]杨琳娜.中等职业教育对劳动者收入效应研究[J].价格理论与实践,2023(8):87-91.
[4]李桂荣,李文华.读中职真的“不值”吗——基于就业质量视角的实证分析[J].教育发展研究,2022,42(Z1):39-44+56.
[5]李兰兰.初中学生对高中阶段入学选择实证研究[J].职教论坛,2009(32):8-10.
[6]郑筱婷,孙志颖,汪鲸.选择普通高中教育还是中等职业教育——高中阶段不同类型教育期望回报率的实证分析[J].教育研究,2023,44(1):103-117.
[7]周慧梅,汪冰冰.近代中国职业教育制度生成的困境分析——以民众职业教育选择为中心[J].中国职业技术教育,2016(30):46-51.
[8]张力跃.职业趋高级化与农村职业教育发展的新空间[J].社会科学战线,2012(5):200-207.
[9]沈玉顺.中招考试制度改革若干政策问题分析[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2014,32(3):26-30.
[10]陈宣霖.异地中考政策促进随迁子女选择高中教育吗[J].复旦教育论坛,2021,19(1):75-81.
[11]王进,汪宁宁.教育选择:理性还是文化——基于广州市的实证调查[J].社会学研究,2013,28(3):76-100+243.
[12]陈鹏,刘铖.“三孩”何以赋能中职发展——多孩家庭的职校选择研究[J].中国职业技术教育,2022(4):5-11+32.
[13]陈宁军.简论受教育者的教育选择[J].宁波大学学报,2001(8):16-18.
[14]YUN-HEE JEON. The Application of Grouded Theory and Symbolic Interactionism[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science,2004(18):249-256.
[15]陈向明.扎根理论的思路和方法[J].教育研究与实验,1999(4):58-63+73.
[16]何莎薇,徐国庆.深化人事制度改革是提升技能型人才社会地位的关键保障[J].中国职业技术教育,2021(12):63-67.
[17]陈礼业,徐国庆.“趋普避职”教育选择文化的生成、流变与行为转化——基于马凌诺斯基文化理论的分析[J].教育发展研究,2023,43(21):58-66.
基本信息:
DOI:
中图分类号:G719.2
引用信息:
[1]王浩南,徐国庆.初中毕业生家长为何不选职业教育——基于扎根理论的质性分析[J].中国职业技术教育,2025,No.910(06):70-77+112.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金教育学重大课题“技能型社会测度模型、驱动因素及路径优化研究”(项目编号:VJA220006,主持人:徐国庆)